Hattara Mai Tona Asirin

Menene ke zuwa zuciya idan kun ji kalmar, “mai ɓullowa”? Yawancin lokaci, wannan kalma tana haɗa hotunan ma'aikata waɗanda ke sanya ayyukansu da abubuwan rayuwarsu a kan layi don fallasa ƙazantattun wuraren aiki kamar zamba ko wasu cin zarafin ko sun kasance ba bisa doka ba, fasikanci ko rashin da'a. A cikin ɗaya daga cikin shafukan yanar gizo na da na gabata, na rubuta game da halartar lacca da Sherron Watkins, wanda ya kasance ɗaya daga cikin manyan masu faɗin gaskiya a fallasa abin kunya na Enron. Abin mamaki ne a ji yadda Madam Watkins ta kasance daga kasancewa cikin da'irar ciki a Enron, sannan a gano yadda Enron execs ke amfani da dabaru na yaudara don tayar da farashin hannun jari na Enron da sarrafa kasuwannin iskar gas. Ko da mafi muni shine lokacin da waɗannan shuwagabannin suka tsere da kudaden ritayar ma'aikaci na Enron don su rufe basussuka. Lokacin da gidan katunan ya rushe, Enron ya faɗi ƙasa sosai kuma da yawa a cikin babban ɗakin Enron sun fuskanci lokacin kurkuku, yayin da ma'aikatan Enron (gami da Watkins) aka bar su ba tare da ayyuka ko fansho ba.

Koyaya, ba duk masu ba da sanarwar ba daidai bane. Dauki misalin aikin Matthiesen, Bjorkelo and Burke (2011), wanda ya rubuta wani aiki mai taken: Cin Zarafin Aiki a Matsayin Bangaren Duhu. Suna ba da cikakken bayani game da masu alfahari da masu fallasa waɗanda son zuciya kawai ke motsa su. Miethe (1999) ya yi nuni da cewa yayin da ake iya ganin wasu masu fallasa a matsayin masu son kai, mutane masu son kai waɗanda ke ɗaukar mataki a cikin "ƙimar kuɗi na musamman" wasu za a iya kwatanta su da "son kai da son kai" (galibi ana kwatanta su da "kwace", "beraye", “Moles”, “finks” da “blabbermouths”. Don haka yana da mahimmanci don duba dalilan masu rufa -rufa. Misali ana motsa su ta hanyar tunanin lamiri na ɗabi'a don gyara wasu kurakurai ko don kawo gyara a yanayin da kamfanoni , ƙungiyoyi ko daidaikun mutane suna yin aiki ba bisa ƙa'ida ba, fasikanci ko haramtacciyar hanya? yin laifi amma maimakon yin hakan saboda son zuciya, ramuwar gayya, ko don ƙara yiwuwar haɓaka kansu zuwa tsani na kamfanoni fa? ko ƙirƙirar bayanan ƙarya don saukar da mai dubawa, Shugaba ko abokin aiki kuma yana iya yin hakan ba tare da an sani ba, amma a ƙarƙashin dokokin ɓoye bayanan waɗannan mutanen kuma za a kiyaye su daga ɗaukar fansa, kamar yadda waɗanda ke fallasa zamba ko sata don ɗabi'a ko an kare dalilan altruistic. Yawancin mu ba su da matsala da masu ba da gaskiya na gaskiya ana ba su kariya a ƙarƙashin doka lokacin da shari'arsu ke da kyau kuma mai kyau, amma fa game da masu ɓullar ɓarna waɗanda ke yin ƙarya da gurɓata bayanai don ciyar da kansu gaba? Shin ɗaya daga cikin Dokoki Goma, “Kada Ka Shaida Maƙwabcinka Ƙarya”? A takaice, kada ku yi karya game da wasu mutane, daidai ne?

A haƙiƙanin batun ɓatanci na yaudara wanda mu da kanmu muke sane da shi, wani gungun ma’aikatan gwamnatin jihar sociopathic sun yi tir da daraktan sashen gwamnatin jihar wanda Gwamnan jihar ya nada don ƙwarewar ta da ƙwarewar shekaru 20 a cikin aikin ta. an wuce shi don gabatarwa. Daga karshe an tilastawa daraktan yin murabus lokacin da aka zarge ta da bayar da tallafi ga “kawayenta”, yayin da a zahiri, fadada tallafin ya kasance abin karbuwa a tsakanin magabata. Bugu da ƙari kowane dala na kuɗin tallafin da aka kashe an lissafa shi yayin da ya tafi ayyukan gini da faɗaɗa sabis na shirin. Da fatan za ku iya gani daga wannan misalin dalilin da yasa masana da yawa ba sa son wani ɓangare na gwamnatin jiha ko ta tarayya saboda nau'ikan gulmar da muka bayyana a taƙaice a sama, tare da jan aiki wanda ke hana mutane masu himma damar yin abin da ya dace kuma a zahiri samun abubuwa. aikata. Maimakon haka abin da yawancin ofisoshin hukuma ke koya shine yadda ake wasan. Abin da ya kara dagula al'amura shi ne lokacin da aka nada “mutanen waje” zuwa jiha ko gwamnatin tarayya kan mukamai ba tare da wani ma’aikaci da zai tallafa musu ba. Yawancin lokaci ba sa daɗewa kuma saƙon da suke zuwa da shi shine “ƙwararrun ba sa buƙatar amfani”.

Don haka me za mu iya koya daga wannan labarin “mai ɓoyewa”? Na farko, ba duk masu fallasa masu ƙarfin hali, ɗabi'a da son kai kamar Sherron Watkins ko chemist, Jeff Wigand wanda ya fallasa ƙaryar masana'antar sigari ga jama'a game da ainihin cutar shan sigari. Ba duk masu tuhumar da ba a san su ba suna da dalilai na gaskiya. Wasu sun fita don ci gaba da ayyukansu da fuka -fukan nasu. Lokacin tantance wanda wanne ne, akwai shawarwari guda biyu: 1) tantance wanda ke amfana da ɗaukar matakin mai satar bayanan kuma 2) bi kuɗin ... watau. wanda ke samun riba.

Ga duk ku masu ilimin halin ɗabi'a a can, idan kuna son kawar da maigidan ku, abokin aiki ko ma Shugaba, ku yi ƙarya game da su kuma ku zauna ku kalli wasan wuta. Ka ce suna yin lalata da tumaki ko wani abu daidai gwargwado saboda a lokacin da ƙura ta lafa kuma shugaban ku ko mai kula da ku, za a sami waɗanda suka yarda da duk abin da suka karanta a cikin jarida kuma har yanzu suna tunanin, “wataƙila na maigida yana yin lalata da tumaki ”. Misali gwamnan New Jersey na yanzu, Chris Christie. Akwai manyan lokuta guda biyu da aka zargi Christie da rashin dacewa. Na farko kuma na baya -bayan nan shi ne abin kunya na Ƙofar Bridge, wanda yanzu ya fara samun ɗanɗano. Wasu sun ce mai yiwuwa Bridge Gate ya kasance babban dalilin da ya sa ba a zaɓi Christie a matsayin mataimakiyar Trump ba. Na biyu ya shafi labarin da New York Times ta karya a 2012 wanda ya yi zargin alakar Christie da kwangilolin miliyoyin daloli da ake ba gidajen rabin jihar da aka biya ga mutanen da ke fitowa daga gidajen yarin jihohi. The Times ta ruwaito cewa da yawa daga cikin waɗannan rabin gidajen ba a kula da su sosai kuma ya zama gama gari ga mazaunan rabin gida su bar kafin su yi lokacin su. A cikin irin wannan misalin, ɗaya daga cikin waɗannan tsoffin fursunoni, David Goodell, wanda ya tashi daga wannan gidan mara kyau mara kyau, daga baya ya kashe tsohuwar budurwa. (Sauti mai kama da karar Willy Horton da ta addabi dan takarar Shugaban kasa, yakin neman zaben Michael Dukakis?) Amma duk da labarin mai shafi da yawa a cikin New York Times daga mai ba da rahoto Sam Dolnick, zargin da ake yi wa Christie bai taba yin tasiri ba. Mutane da yawa har yau, har yanzu suna tambaya me yasa?

Don haka ga abin da za a yi tunani akai. Me yasa wasu lokuta na rashin mutunci, zamba ko cin hanci da rashawa da rahotannin masu rufa -rufa suka ruwaito ba sa haifar da wasu canje -canje masu mahimmanci (kamar na Gwamna Christie) yayin da a wasu lokutan zargin ƙarya da masu rufa -rufa sun bayyana na iya haifar da ƙwararrun mutane rasa ayyukansu. Wannan zai yi nazari mai ban sha’awa don duba lokutan da zargin ɓoyayyen ɓoyayyiyar ɓarna ta ɓarke ​​inda a wasu lokutan suka faɗi ta hanya.

Nassoshi da karatuttukan da aka ba da shawara:

Abokan Aiki masu guba: Yadda za a magance mutanen da ba sa aiki akan Ayuba. A. Cavaiola da N. Lavender.

Babiak, P. & Hare, RD (2006). Macizai a cikin Suit: Lokacin da Psychopaths ke zuwa Aiki. New York: Harper Collins.

Dolnick, Sam (2012, Yuni 16). Yayin da masu tserewa ke fita, kasuwancin azaba yana bunƙasa. Jaridar New York.

Krugman, Paul (2012, 21 ga Yuni). Gidajen yari, zaman kansu da tallafa musu. Jaridar New York.

Mattiesen, SB, Bjorkelo, B., & Burke, RJ (2011). Zalunci wurin aiki a matsayin duhu na

Fuskar banza. A cikin S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, Zapf, D. & Cooper, CL (Eds.) Zalunci da

Tursasawa a wurin Aiki.2nd ed Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group (shafi na 301-324).

Miethe, TD (1999). Fusawa a wurin aiki: Zaɓuɓɓuka masu tsauri wajen fallasa zamba, ɓata da ɓarna akan aiki. Boulder, CO: Jaridar Westview.